Netflix spends considerable effort to maintain a culture of values congruence. By aligning employees actions with their values, Netflix can build what I think is the most effective competitive advantage, a culture of trust. Its values are action oriented and drive performance management and talent management across the company.
This Netflix slide deck explains how they maintain their culture. After reading it several months ago, I have recommended it to several friends and colleagues. I didn’t want my faithful readers to miss the benefits, so I have embedded the slides below.
How different would the world be if all employers/managers were this focused on driving results from its teams?
Popularity: 1% [?]
A VP at my company sent me an article from Catalyst, a magazine about Ohio CPAs asking for the top three points of the article. The article entitled, “Inside the Minds of Young CPAs” (subscription needed) is quite interesting. These young CPAs express some of the values of Gen Y workers, but not all. Below I have summarized the top three thoughts from the article and I added the top three thoughts I find in the blogosphere.
Points from “Inside the Minds of Young CPA’s”:
- Frequent and candid feedback is important. Feedback isn’t just for formal quarterly items. Underlying theme: Gen Y wants to grow. Enable them to do so by providing feedback.
- Gen Y doesn’t buy into the face time. They buy into goals and their associated results. Don’t expect a 50 hour work week unless there is 50 hours of actual work to be done.
- Promotions are not about long hours, experience and timing. They are about performance, initiative, leadership and demonstrations of learning. Poignant quote: “When you can show you are ready to lead and coach new hires, that’s when they’ll consider promoting you.”
Points about Gen Y from the Blogosphere:
- Employee Evolution: Social Media is a collaboration tool. It will do to corporate relationships and information sharing what E-mail did to the mail room.
- Modite: Job hopping is good for your career. Get paid what you are worth. Over Perform. Be risky. Turn down job offers.
- Newly Corporate: Relationships matter more than delivery. He who reads the manual is the expert. Email and interruptions are the enemy of productivity.
Gen X came into the workplace thinking they would change things, but eventually played by the “boomer’s” rules. Will Gen Y have a lasting impact?
My answer is yes because they typically are more productive because they are “digital natives.”
What do you think about these topics? Is the corporate world on its way?
Popularity: 9% [?]
There have been some wise thoughts about Social Media ROI that resonate with me from my finance background that are a nice corollary to Kristen’s arguments: Social Networking is not about ROI.
Peter Kim, a former Forrester Social Media analyst said:
“Calculating ROI from social media efforts is no different.
If ROI doesn’t apply to social media marketing, then social media should not be used for marketing.”
Jason responded by saying he thinks that the social media ROI issue is:
“a failure of data analysis, not a failure of marketing.”
Return on investment is a measure that should be used sparingly but tested often, relationships are not calculated in ROI, but money generated from those relationships and the cost of maintaining them can be. Just like sales teams monitor ROI by choosing Webex instead of flying to a meeting in Denver.
If you have ever been a consultant, you’ve had to log your hours to client numbers, and account numbers and project numbers. Social media is no different.
I think the capabilities to measure social media efforts online will far surpass the ability for corporations to measure ROI on old media marketing: magazines, newspapers, television.
Sure, ROI shouldn’t be the driving motivator in interacting with real humans, but to sustain a business a measure like ROI sure does enable business to thrive. Just don’t let such a great measure of value go the way of now generic terms like “Web 2.0.”
Popularity: 11% [?]
Gartner just released its 2008 Magic Quadrant for Social Software. I stumbled upon
Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Social Software 2008:
It is interesting how Microsoft and IBM are definitive challengers and Jive Software/Atlassian/Socialtextare all just barely visionaries. I find the chart interesting because the “ability to execute” portion of the measurement has a heavy sales and market penetration component. Obviously IBM and Microsoft will be able to excel here by bundling software with Office or Lotus Notes.
The Magic Quadrant shows us that no clear leader in this space(the upper right quadrant) exists. Who will be the first to move into that coveted upper right corner?
So what do you think of how the product companies ended up on the chart? No clear leader, a lot of consolidation to occur for sure. If you were an IT spend director, where would you spend your Enterprise 2.0 budget?
Popularity: 17% [?]
Latest Comments